Pope stokes debate on Darwin and evolution

From Times Online
April 12, 2007
Pope stokes debate on Darwin and evolution


(Ettore Ferrari/EPA)

Benedict XVI has given mixed signals on evolution since becoming pontiff
Mark Bridge and agencies

Evolution has not been “scientifically” proven and science has unnecessarily narrowed humanity’s view of creation, Pope Benedict has said in his first reflections on the origins of life.

In comments to students, published yesterday in German, the Pope – who took office in April 2005 – stopped short of endorsing intelligent design and said “faith alone” could not “explain the whole picture”.

But, he said: “We cannot haul 10,000 generations into the laboratory.”

He advised the students not to choose between creationism and evolutionary theory but to adopt “an interaction of various dimensions of reason”.

He said: “I find it important to underline that the theory of evolution implies questions that must be assigned to philosophy and which themselves lead beyond the realms of science.”

Benedict reflected on comments of his predecessor, John Paul II, who said that theories of evolution were sound as long as they took into account that creation was the work of God, and that Darwin’s theory of evolution was “more than a hypothesis."

He said: “The pope [John Paul] had his reasons for saying this. But it is also true that the theory of evolution is not a complete, scientifically proven theory.”

Benedict added that the immense time span that evolution covers made it impossible to conduct experiments in a controlled environment to verify or disprove the theory.

Evolution has come under fire in recent years by proponents – mostly conservative Protestants – of “intelligent design,” who believe that living organisms are so complex they must have been created by a higher power.

In the United States, supporters of both camps have often clashed over what students should be taught in state schools. New attention has been focused on Roman Catholic views of the issue since Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna said in a speech that restricting debate on Darwin’s theories amounted to censorship.

The Pope’s comments, recorded in the new book Creation and Evolution, appear alongside the reflections of Cardinal Schönborn and others who attended a meeting of students at the papal summer estate at Castelgandolfo outside Rome in September.

His remarks were consistent with one of his most repeated themes, that faith and reason are interdependent and that science, however vital, should not rule out God.

“Science has opened up large dimensions of reason... and thus brought us new insights,” he said. “But in the joy at the extent of its discoveries, it tends to take away from us dimensions of reason that we still need.

“Its results lead to questions that go beyond its methodical canon and cannot be answered within it.”

Since taking office, the Pope has sent mixed signals on evolution. In November 2005, Cardinal Paul Poupard, head of the Pontifical Council for Culture, told a press conference that the Genesis account of creation and Darwin’s theory of evolution were “perfectly compatible” if the Bible was read correctly.

But last year, Benedict fired his chief astronomer, Father George Coyne, after the American Jesuit priest made similar comments in The Tablet. The sacking was interpreted by commentators as a clear endorsement for intelligent design.

The comments of this Pope, like those of John Paul II, best adhere to the doctrine of theistic evolution, which sees God creating by a process of evolution. This is accepted – openly or tacitly – by Roman Catholicism and the mainstream Protestant denominations.
Have your say
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Pope Benedict said,

"the theory of evolution is not a complete, scientifically proven theory.”

Is he trying to say that religion is a complete, scientifically proven theory? How can he comment on the falseness of evolution when his very own religion cannot be proven in any way, scientifically or otherwise?

One thing is for certain: examples of evolution, however theoretical, can be demonstrated in labs everyday. Now can somebody show me a picture of God? Anybody?

Didn't think so.
David Olsen, Manchester, England
-------------------------------------------------------------------

There are Roman Catholic Scholars in Biological Evolution who would probably reserve judgement until reading the book. I can tell you what we think right now. "Observed specication" is a fact. Look it up. We use science to explain facts like these and the fossil-record which includes other hominoid forms that existed at a time before we did... and quite frankly a time when we where not around. DNA analysis has already verified what Darwin knew. We can see our evolutionary changes in the DNA. That history is over 10,000 generations old and guess what? Our own DNA does not disprove evolution but it validates it. I think this analogy of the laboratory is not a good one. I hope his book talks about DNA. If it doesn't I would hold reserves on how much he actually knows about evolution.

Ben Holland, Cork, Ireland
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The pope is a little late, a CofE bishop over a century ago preached acceptance of modern science: "If we are wise we shall endeavour to understand and to absorb these truths. They are our proper heritage as Christians, for they are manifestations of the Eternal Word....they will add breadth and strength and depth to our theology....If the time should come when evolution is translated from the realm of suggestive theory to the region of acknowledged fact, what then? Will it not carry still further the idea of providential design and order? Will it not reinforce with new and splendid illustrations the magnificent lesson of modern science-complexity of results traced back to simplicity of principles-variety of phenomena issuing from unity of order-the gathering up, as it were, of the threads which connect the universe, in the right hand of the One Eternal Word?&

LJD, New York, US,
Read all 34 comments